History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm
313 U.S. 549
SCOTUS
1941
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; (3) Kryger v. Wilson, 242 U. S. 171, 176; Tinney v. Guy, 189 U. S. 335, *550340; Johnson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 U. S. 491, 496.

Mr. Sigmund H. Stéinberg for appellant. Mr. Aloys C. Link for appellee.

Case Details

Case Name: Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 2, 1941
Citation: 313 U.S. 549
Docket Number: No. 1067
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.