History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alphonse v. State
593 So. 2d 612
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment
CASE, JAMES R., Associate Judge.

The defendant challenges her conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance on two grounds. We find merit to only one of her contentions.

The defendant argues the court erred in enhancing her sentence as a habitual offender without including either in a written order or in oral statements in the record an acknowledgment of the receipt of the necessary documentation required by section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). We agree and remand for the trial court to either make the requisite findings based on proper evidentiary support, or, if the record does not support such, vacate the habitual offender sentence and resentence the defendant according to the guidelines. See Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Alphonse v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 14, 1992
Citation: 593 So. 2d 612
Docket Number: No. 91-00139
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.