| U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York | Nov 2, 1896
This is a motion to remand the cause to the state court, on the ground that the removal to this court was too late. It appears that in the state court, on some application before the state court, it was stated by Mr. Sturges, the attorney, to the court, that the time to answer must be extended, to which it is said the judge assented. No order to extend the time was presented to the judge, or signed by him. On the next day, the plaintiff’s attorney signed a stipulation, extending the time to answer and to move, and, before the extension of the time to answer fixed by the stipulation had expired, the cause was removed to this court.
It seems to ine that, under the practice of the supreme court of this state, the time to answer did not expire until the date fixed by the stipulation, which was June 10th, and the removal before that date was in time. It has been so held by Judge Wallace. Winberg v. Lumber Co., 29 F. 721" date_filed="1887-07-01" court="None" case_name="Winberg v. Berkeley Co. Ry. & Lumber Co.">29 Fed. 721. But, if this were otherwise, I am of the opinion that, under the circumstances above stated, the plaintiff should not be heard in this court to say that the time to answer had expired. Motion to remand is denied.