Allison v. HedgesAllison v. Hedges
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Dewey
This wаs an action on a promissory note, commenced before á justiсe of the peace, and tаken by ap*547peal to the Circuit Cоurt. The parties appeared before the justice, and the cаuse was continued. The defendant nоt appearing on the day set for trial, judgment went against him by default. In the Circuit Cоurt, the plaintiff having established his causе of action under the general issue, the .defendant proved that the justice who tried the action was a justice of Wayne township in Allen county, in which township the aсtion was commenced; and that the defendant, at the time of the serviсe of process, and of the triаl, was a resident and householder of Washington township in that county. Upon this proof, the Court dismissed the cause on the grоund that the justice had no jurisdiction of it.
It is contended that the judgment of the Circuit Cоurt is justified by a statute respecting the jurisdiсtion of justices in Allen county. That statute provides, that a defendant in a civil аction, resident in that county, shall be sued in the township in which he resides, if there be a justice therein who can legаlly try the cause. Laws of 1839, p. 90.
It may be quеstionable whether, under this statute, the defendant, in order to oust the jurisdiction оf the justice of Wayne township, should not have carried the proof farther than he did, and have shown that a justice rеsided in Washington township. But we shall not stop to settle this point, as our decision will turn on аnother principle. It is enacted in the justice’s act, “ that after an аppeal to the Circuit Court, no suit shall be dismissed because the same wаs commenced out of the prоper township, unless objection shаll have been made on the heаring of said cause before the justiсe.” R. S. 1838, p. 366. This provision embraces аll cases in which the jurisdiction of the justiсe depends upon the township in whiсh the action is commenced. As the defendant made no objection before the justice to his right to try the cause, it was too late to urge that matter in the Circuit Court. It was erroneous to dismiss the cause.
Per Curiam.The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.