History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alley v. Halcombe
96 Ga. 810
Ga.
1895
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

The judgment denying a rule absolute upon the mortgage foreclosure was, in effect, a judgment of nonsuit; and it was too late, after the expiration of the term at which it was rendered, to move to reinstate the plaintiff’s case because of error committed in the rendition of that judgment. The plaintiff should either have moved to reinstate during the term, or have filed a bill of exceptions within the time prescribed by law.

Judgment affirmed.

EL H. Dean, W. T. Crane and J. W. H. Underwood, for plaintiff. J. B. Estes and Perry & Craiu, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Alley v. Halcombe
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 29, 1895
Citation: 96 Ga. 810
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.