History
  • No items yet
midpage
Aller v. State
212 N.W.2d 702
Wis.
1973
Check Treatment

The following opinion was filed on February 5, 1974.

Per Curiam

(on motion for rehearing). Plaintiff in error, David Aller, has moved for rehearing on the issue of whether evidence of a drug sale subsequent to that for which he was being tried was admissible in his trial on the initial charge. While the issue was properly preserved for appeal, the evidence was clearly admissible to rebut the defense of entrapment. State v. Monsoor (1973), 56 Wis. 2d 689, 203 N. W. 2d 20. “. . . This evidence need not be confined to past felony convictions and criminal reputation, and, as we have held, need not be limited to conduct occurring prior in time to the crime charged. . . .” Id. at pages 703, 704.

Motion for rehearing denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Aller v. State
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 21, 1973
Citation: 212 N.W.2d 702
Docket Number: No. State 19
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.