History
  • No items yet
midpage
Allen v. State
110 Ga. App. 293
Ga. Ct. App.
1964
Check Treatment
Russell, Judge.

In each of these cases the single special ground is but an amplification of the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. The defendant admitted breaking a window in the place of business of the prosecutor, but as against the charge of malicious mischief contended that he slipped on some loose gravel and the glass was broken accidentally as he fell. The defendant also admitted on another occasion delaying to leave the place of business of the prosecutor immediately on being asked to leave, but as against the charge of trespass contended that he was in fear of his life because an assailant was waiting for him outside with a gun. There is substantial eyewitness testimony in each case negating these *294explanations. Conflicts in evidence being for the decision of the triors of fact, where issues of fact are in conflict, this court passes only on the sufficiency and not on the weight of the evidence. Pryor v. State, 102 Ga. App. 744 (117 SE2d 880).

Decided September 22, 1964. Robert E. Williams, for plaintiff in error. Wilson P. Darden, Solicitor, contra.

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial in each case.

Judgments affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Allen v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 22, 1964
Citation: 110 Ga. App. 293
Docket Number: 40807, 40808
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.