27 Ga. App. 625 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1921
1. An opinion as to what had been proved was not expressed by the judge in charging the jury as set out in grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for a new trial. See, in connection with ground 4, City & Surburban Ry. Co. v. Findley, 76 Ga. 311 (3), 317; Brown v. State, 6 Ga. App. 356 (64 S. E. 1119); Allen v. State, 18 Ga. App. 1 (88 S. E. 100).
2. The excerpts from the charge embraced in grounds 5 and 6 of the motion for a new trial contain no error harmful to the defendant.
3. The brief of counsel for plaintiff in error contains no “ general insistence upon all the grounds of the motion ” (Ga. L. 1921, p. 232), and grounds 7 and 8 are not mentioned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore are at least “ impliedly ” abandoned.
4. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
cited: Civil Code (1910), § 4334; 91 Ga. 167; 96 Ga. 584; 3 Ga. App. 651 (3); 1 Ga. App. 542 (1).
