History
  • No items yet
midpage
Allen v. State
39 S.E. 865
Ga.
1901
Check Treatment
'Lewis, J.

The evidence, though not absolutely clear and convincing, was sufficient to sustain the conviction of the accused, and the Supreme Court will therefore not disturb the judgment of the court below overruling the motion for new trial, which was based only on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Allen v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 5, 1901
Citation: 39 S.E. 865
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.