History
  • No items yet
midpage
Allen v. . Hammond
122 N.C. 754
N.C.
1898
Check Treatment

There is no complaint, answer or summons sent up, only the case on appeal; and the complaint is essential to be considered in passing on this controversy. Defects in the transcript are often remedied by certiorari when there is no laches on the part of the appellant, and sometime by the Court's sending down a certiorari ex mero motu to supply merely formal parts of the transcript. S. v. Preston, 104 N.C. 733; S. v. Beal,119 N.C. 809; S. v. Daniel, 121 N.C. 574. But here the defect is in a material respect and no motion for certiorari has been made by the appellant. He has not perfected his record on appeal and not having paid due attention to it, let the motion to dismiss be entered.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Finch v. Strickland, 130 N.C. 46.

Case Details

Case Name: Allen v. . Hammond
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 3, 1898
Citation: 122 N.C. 754
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.