History
  • No items yet
midpage
Allen-Bradley Co. v. United States
134 Ct. Cl. 800
Ct. Cl.
1956
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Madden, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves the same question twice previously decided by this court. The Wickes Corporation v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 741; Ohio Power Co. v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 95, certiorari denied, 350 U. S. 862. In accord is National Lead Co. v. Commissioner, 23 T. C. 988, 1002. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the Tax Court, Commissioner v. National Lead Co., 1956 CCH, par. 9290.

We have reconsidered our earlier decisions in the light of the contrary decision cited above and, with deference, adhere to the view expressed in them.

The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and judgment will be entered for the plaintiff. The amount of recovery will be determined pursuant to Rule 38 (c).

It is so ordered.

Laramore, Judge/ Whitaker, Judge; and Littleton, Judge, concur.





Dissenting Opinion

Jones, Chief Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent for reasons stated in dissents in the WicJces and Ohio Power Company cases cited in the majority opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Allen-Bradley Co. v. United States
Court Name: United States Court of Claims
Date Published: Apr 3, 1956
Citation: 134 Ct. Cl. 800
Docket Number: No. 290-55
Court Abbreviation: Ct. Cl.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.