202 Ky. 843 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1924
Opinion of the Court by
Affirming.
In July, 1918, appellant took possession of a rock-crusher belonging to appellee, -which it moved to a government quarry upon the military reservation at Camp Taylor in Jefferson county, Ky., and, after using it- for about a month in crushing rock upon the reservation, left it at the quarry where it was destroyed.
Thereafter appellee instituted this action against appellant for conversion of the rock crusher, and recovered therefor the sum of $1,600.00, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
A jury was waived, and the court, upon motion so to do, stated separately his findings of fact and law as follows :
‘ ‘ That the crusher and parts alleged to have been ■converted by the defendant were taken by the superintendent Skilton of the Alfred Struck Company. The court further finds that although Major Gilbert, in authority at Camp Taylor and connected with the United States army at the time, is claimed by the said Skilton to have made a contract with Hardin county for the use of the crusher, such contract was never made, and that the taking by the said superintendent was in fact without authority of any contract. The court further finds as a fact that neither the fiscal court of Hardin county nor the county judge, D. W. Rider, ever entered into a contract with either the Alfred Struck Company or the war department or anyone acting for them for the use of the said crusher.
“The court further finds as a fact that neither Major Gilbert nor anyone connected with the war department claimed or took the machinery in question under any authority of Congress or military law.
“The court holds as a matter of law under these circumstances this amounts to a conversion by the Alfred Struck Company of the property in question, and that it is liable for the reasonable market value ■of the property at the time it was so taken, which the court finds to be $1,600.00.”
It is therefore apparent that the court decided the case against appellant upon the facts, and not, as assumed by its counsel, upon the theory that the federal government had no right in time of war to requisition and commandeer whatever property it needed for the purpose of the common defense.
It is likewise apparent that the judgment must be ■affirmed even though the federal government had such
We are wholly unable to find in the entire record a single bit of evidence upon which a different finding of fact could have been based. No one testified that Major Gilbert, or any other governmental officer or agent, contracted with Hardin county for the crusher, or commandeered it or authorized appellant so to do.
Appellant does not exhibit its contract with the government, and for aught that appears, it was its duty under whatever contract it had with the government, to furnish a crusher or whatever implements and equipment it needed to carry out its contract.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.