midpage

Alford v. FloridaAlford v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 4, 1976
74-6717
Reporters:
Before:
Marshall

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.






Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Petitioner contends that his right ‍​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‍of confrontation, guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, was violated because the transcript of the preliminary hearing testimony of a material prosecution witness was read at his trial and the prosecution, ‍​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‍although it was aware that the witness would leave Florida prior to the trial, failed to use available procedures to assure the witness’ presence at trial or to depose the witness before ‍​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‍the trial began. See Barber v. Page, 390 U. S. 719 (1968). On the record in this case, we would grant certiorari and set the case for oral argument.

In any event, the imposition and carrying out of ‍​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‍the death penalty in this case constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg v. Georgia, ante, p. 227 (Brennan, J., dissenting); id., p. 231 (Marshall, J., dissenting). We would therefore grant ‍​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‍certiorari and vacate the judgment in this case insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death sentence imposed.

Case Details

Case Name: Alford v. Florida
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 4, 1976
Citations: 428 U.S. 912; 74-6717
Docket Number: 74-6717
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In