History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alford v. Florida
428 U.S. 912
| SCOTUS | 1976
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.






Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Petitioner contends that his right of confrontation, guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, was violated because the transcript of the preliminary hearing testimony of a material prosecution witness was read at his trial and the prosecution, although it was aware that the witness would leave Florida prior to the trial, failed to use available procedures to assure the witness’ presence at trial or to depose the witness before the trial began. See Barber v. Page, 390 U. S. 719 (1968). On the record in this case, we would grant certiorari and set the case for oral argument.

In any event, the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in this case constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg v. Georgia, ante, p. 227 (Brennan, J., dissenting); id., p. 231 (Marshall, J., dissenting). We would therefore grant certiorari and vacate the judgment in this case insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death sentence imposed.

Case Details

Case Name: Alford v. Florida
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 4, 1976
Citation: 428 U.S. 912
Docket Number: 74-6717
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.