History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alfonza Greenhill v. Harold Clarke
699 F. App'x 280
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfonza Hardy Greenhill, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Mary Grace Miller, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alfonza Hardy Greenhill appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. [*] See Dewhurst v. Century Aluminum Co. , 649 F.3d 287, 290 (4th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Greenhill v. Clarke , No. 7:16-cv-00068-JPJ-RSB (W.D. Va. May 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] By this disposition, we express no opinion as to the ultimate merits of Greenhill’s claims. 2

Case Details

Case Name: Alfonza Greenhill v. Harold Clarke
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 31, 2017
Citation: 699 F. App'x 280
Docket Number: 17-6696
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.