Alexander v. Marech
116 N.J.L. 246 | N.J. | 1936
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Pekskie, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Eaeeeety, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Hei-iee, J. 1.