Alexander v. Marech
183 A. 459
N.J.1936Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.
For reversal — HEHER, J. 1. *Page 247