Alexander v. Marech

183 A. 459 | N.J. | 1936

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — HEHER, J. 1.