History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alexander v. Gould
1 Mass. 165
Mass.
1804
Check Treatment

But the Court (Strong, Sedgwick, and Thacher, justices) ruled .that the evidence was inadmissible. Sedgwick, J., said the circumstances did not, as yet, appear to be strong enough.

The counsel for Gould, to shorten the case, immediately gave in evidence the declarations of the demandant, by which it clearly appeared that the note itself had been given to Osmer, and endorsed to Alexander, upon a corrupt agreement, between Alexander and Linnett, respecting false testimony given, or to have been given, in a court of justice. Upon which, the Court said that it was of no consequence, in the present case, whether the deed be fraudulent or not; that the demandant ought to come into Court with clean hands ; but coming as he does, it is impossible for him to maintain the action.

Demandant nonsuited.

Case Details

Case Name: Alexander v. Gould
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1804
Citation: 1 Mass. 165
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.