History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alexander R. Davis and Rebecca R. Davis v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company
15-0019
| Tex. App. | Feb 23, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 FILED 15-0019 2/23/2015 12:49:51 PM tex-4246714 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK NO. 15-0019 ______________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ______________________________________ ALEXANDER R. DAVIS AND REBECCA R. DAVIS, Petitioners, v.

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

________________________________________________ On Appeal from the Fifth District Court of Appeals, Dallas, Texas Appeal No. 05-12-01715-CV Trial Court No. DC-11-06356, Dallas County, Texas ___________________________________ APPELLANTS’ SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW ___________________________________ TO THE HONORABLE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS:

Petitioners, Alexander R. Davis and Rebecca R. Davis, file this Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Review under T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.1, 10.5(b), and 53.7(f). In support of this Motion, Petitioners show the following: The Court of Appeals for the Fifth District in Dallas (“Court of

Appeals”) rendered its opinion and judgment in Alexander R. Davis and Rebecca *2 R. Davis v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, No. 05-12-01715-CV, on July 28, 2014.

2. On August 7, 2014, Petitioners timely filed their Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing, which was granted on August 8, 2014, extending the due date for the filing of their Motion for Rehearing to September 11, 2014. Petitioners filed their Motion for Rehearing on September 11, 2014. On September 29, 2014, the Court of Appeals denied Petitioners’ Motion for Rehearing.

3. On October 7, 2014, the Petitioners timely filed their Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing En Banc, which was granted on October 9, 2014, extending the due date for the filing of their Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing En Banc to November 13, 2014. Petitioners filed their Motion for Rehearing En Banc on November 13, 2014. On December 8, 2014, the Court of Appeals denied Petitioners’ Motion for Rehearing En Banc.

4. The Petition for Review was originally due no later than January 22, 5. On January 12, 2015, Petitioners timely requested an extension of time to February 23, 2015, which was granted by the Court to extend the deadline to February 23, 2015.

6. Petitioners are requesting an additional thirty (30) day extension to March 25, 2015. This is Petitioners’ second request for an extension of time in this case before the Supreme Court of Texas. Petitioners rely on the following facts as a reasonable explanation for

the requested extension of time:

a. Petitioner’s co-counsel, Brad McClellan, is assisting on this petition for review. Mr. McClellan is of counsel to a very small law firm has had an extremely heavy workload with prior deadlines and hearings scheduled along with family and children’s activities. Among other matters, Petitioner’s co-counsel filed an appellate brief with the 1st Court of Appeals in Case No. 01-14-00508-CV on February 13, 2014. Counsel has a response to a petition for review due on March 11, 2015 in Case No. 15- 0062 before this Court. Counsel also has a brief due on March 16, 2015, in the 4 th Court of Appeals in Case No. 04-14-00685-CV.

b. Further, this case involves a significant workers’ compensation matter affecting all business travelers, and it could be impacted by this Court’s granting of the petition in Seabright Ins. Co. v. Lopez , 427 SW3d 442 (Tex. App.--San Antonio Jan. 29, 2014, pet. granted February 20, 2015, with oral argument set for March 26, 2015), and more time is sought to also carefully address the impact of the Seabright v. Lopez case.

c. Additionally Petitioners’ counsel Christopher M. Albert and his paralegal are iced in today due to bad weather conditions due to an ice storm and are filing this request for an extension of time from home. The undersigned has conferred with opposing counsel, Matthew B.

Baumgartner, who indicated there was no opposition to this request.

Therefore, Petitioners pray that this Court grant this Motion to Extend Time.

Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Christopher M. Albert Alan L. Busch Texas Bar No. 03491600 busch@buschllp.com Christopher M. Albert Texas Bar No. 24008550 albert@buschllp.com B USCH R UOTOLO S IMPSON , LLP 100 Crescent Court, Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75201 Phone: 214-855-2880 Fax: 214-855-2871 - and - *5 /s/ Brad McClellan Bradley Dean McClellan Of Counsel, Law Offices of Richard Pena, P.C. State Bar No. 13395980 1701 Directors Blvd., Suite 110 Austin, Texas 78744 brad.mcclellan@yahoo.com (512) 327-6884 telephone (512) 327-8354 facsimile Attorneys for Alexander R. Davis and Rebecca R. Davis, Petitioners CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE As required by T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.1(a)(5), I certify that I have conferred with Matthew Baumgartner, counsel for Respondent by e-mails on February 23, 2015, who indicated that he is unopposed to this Motion.

/s/ Christopher M. Albert Christopher M. Albert CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Petitioners’ Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Review was served through counsel of record by the method indicated below on February 23, 2015:

P.M. Schenkkan (512) 536-9913 – facsimile Matthew B. Baumgartner

G RAVES , D OUGHERTY , H EARON M OODY , P.C.

401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2200

Austin, Texas 78701

Mary Barrow Nichols (512) 224-3215 – facsimile Shannon Simmons Pounds

Texas Mutual Insurance Company

5210 E. Hwy. 290

Austin, Texas 78723

David P. Boyce (512) 476 -5382 - facsimile W RIGHT G REENHILL , P.C.

221 West 6 th Street, Suite 1800

Austin, Texas 78701

Attorneys for Respondent

Texas Mutual Insurance Company

/s/ Christopher M. Albert Christopher M. Albert

Case Details

Case Name: Alexander R. Davis and Rebecca R. Davis v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 23, 2015
Docket Number: 15-0019
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.