History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alexander Baker v. Clair Marlo
698 F. App'x 381
9th Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Clair Marlo appeals from the district court’s judgment in a copyright action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. NewGen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC , 840 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2016) (grant of motion to enter default judgment); Brandt v. Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla. , *2 653 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 2011) (denial of motion to set aside entry of default and denial of motion to set aside default judgment). We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders entered on August 8, 2016, September 23, 2016, and December 1, 2016.

Appellee’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 10) is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

2 16-56893

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: Alexander Baker v. Clair Marlo
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 5, 2017
Citation: 698 F. App'x 381
Docket Number: 16-56893
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.