Alers v. La Bonne Vie OrganizationAlers v. La Bonne Vie Organization
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff fell in the defendants’ parking lot at a time when a snowstorm had been in progress for approximately eight hours. The plaintiff alleged the cause of his fall was ice that was beneath four to five inches of snow, and that the ice existed prior to the storm that was in progress.
The defendants made a prima facie showing of their
Contrary to the plaintiff‘s contention, the proof offered in opposition to the motion for summary judgment was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the specific icy condition he alleged was the cause of his fall, as opposed to ice in general in the parking lot, existed prior to the storm that was in progress (see Kaplan v DePetro, 51 AD3d 730 [2008]; Robinson v Trade Link Am., 39 AD3d 616 [2007]; Dowden v Long Is. R.R., 305 AD2d 631 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Angiolillo, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.