166 N.Y. 287 | NY | 1901
As the order of the Appellate Division now stands an appeal to this court does not lie. An appeal was taken to the Appellate Division from, the judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The order made on that appeal reads : “ Order appealed from reversed solely upon the grounds : (1) That as a matter of law the plaintiff’s intestate was not free from contributory negligence ; and (2) Because as matter of law the negligence of the defendant was not the cause of the injury complained of; and for those reasons the case ought not to have been submitted to the jury, the court having examined the questions of fact as to .-the other issues in the case and found no error therein.” Though the reversal was solely on questions of law the defendant was entitled to have. the Appellate Division review, not only the questions of law , presented by the case, but also the questions of fact determined by the jury, and an order granting a new trial is appealable to this court only where the Appellate Division
As the plaintiff on the argument requested an opportunity to have the order amended in case we should be of opinion that the order was not appealable in its present form, the decision of this appeal should be suspended till thirty days after the next term held by the Appellate Division of the fourth department, and if no amendment t-o the order is made by the court within that time, then the plaintiff’s appeal must be dismissed, without costs to either party.
Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
