History
  • No items yet
midpage
Albert v. Solimon
94 N.Y.2d 771
NY
1999
Check Treatment
94 N.Y.2d 771 (1999)
721 N.E.2d 17
699 N.Y.S.2d 1

CRYSTAL ALBERT, Appellant,
v.
EZZAT M. SOLIMON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued September 15, 1999.
Decided October 14, 1999.

*772 Nira T. Kermisch, Rochester, for appellant.

Brown & Tarantino, L. L. P., Rochester (Ann M. Campbell of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT. Taking no part: Judge CIPARICK.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that the examination room of the medical office of the orthopedic surgeon, into which plaintiff brought her service dog, was not a "public facility" within the meaning of Civil Rights Law § 47. No other issue is before us.

Case Details

Case Name: Albert v. Solimon
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 14, 1999
Citation: 94 N.Y.2d 771
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.