Albert v. Ford Motor Co.
1932 N.J. LEXIS 358
N.J.
1932
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — TRENCHARD, J. 1. *Page 354