Alaska Seaboard Partners Limited Partnership v. GrantAlaska Seaboard Partners Limited Partnership v. Grant
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated September 22, 2004, which denied the motion of the Public Administrator of Kings County, as administrator of the estate of Victor Grant, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure of the same court dated June 29, 1999, and to
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Public Administrator of Kings County (hereinafter the Public Administrator), as the representative of the deceased mortgagor, moved, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure, entered against the mortgagor after his death. The mortgagor never appeared in the action, and died almost 21 months after he was personally served with the summons and complaint and about 20 months after his default in answering. The motion was made almost five years after the judgment of foreclosure was entered and four-and-one-half-years after the subject property was sold to a bona fide purchaser.
The Supreme Court properly denied the motion (see Bova v Vinciguerra, 139 AD2d 797, 799 [1988] [“where a party’s demise does not affect the merits of a case . . . there is no need for strict adherence to the requirement that the proceedings be stayed pending substitution”]; see also Gushlaw v Roll,