68 Miss. 463 | Miss. | 1891
delivered the opinion of the court.
The verdict should have been,for the- defendant, and the jury might very properly have been so instructed. We are not able to discover any violation of the right of the plaintiff or any failure
The court correctly instructed the j my for the defendant; and it is impossible to account for the verdict, except upon the assumption that the jury felt authorized to find for the plaintiff because of the absence of special accommodations for passengers which would have kept her off the wet ground.
jReversed and remanded for a new trial.