midpage

Akron Bar Ass'n v. BarronAkron Bar Ass'n v. Barron

Ohio Supreme Court
Mar 24, 1999
No. 98-2215
Versions:85 Ohio St. 3d 167
707 N.E.2d 850
Per Curiam.

Practicing law while under suspension for failure to meet continuing legal education requirements and pay the imposed fine warranted indefinite suspension in Toledo Bar Assn. v. Christensen (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 71, *168671 N.E.2d 30, and such a sanction is also warranted in this case. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice- of law in Ohio and remains subject to the conditions of our order of June 18, 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 24, 1999
Citations: 85 Ohio St. 3d 167; 707 N.E.2d 850; No. 98-2215
Docket Number: No. 98-2215
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In