Opinion by
The question involved on this appeal is the same as in the case of Altieri v. Allentown Officers’ and Employees’ Retirement Board, p. 176 ante. The result in the lower court in the instant case is opposite to that reached in the Altieri case. In this case the learned court below sustained the defendant board’s contention that Section 4(b) of the Third Class City Employees Retirement Law of May 23,1945, P.L. 903, violates Sections 11 and 18 of Article III of the Pennsylvania Constitution and, accordingly, entered judgment for the board. The plaintiff-employee thereupon brought this appeal. As we pointed out in the Altieri case, supra, the constitutional questions need not be considered in view of the fact that Section 4(b) is deficient and unenforceable. For the reasons set forth in the Altieri case, we approve the judgment entered in the instant case.
Judgment affirmed.