AJAY GLASS & MIRROR CO., INC. v. AASHA G.C., INC.AJAY GLASS & MIRROR CO., INC. v. AASHA G.C., INC.
Following entry of the partial judgment, Hunt and plaintiff entered into a stipulated settlement agreement resolving plaintiff’s claims against Hunt for nonpayment. AASHA and its president, defendant Barry Halbritter (collectively, AASHA defendants), appeal from an order granting the joint motion of plaintiff and Hunt seeking, inter alia, to vacate the prior order and partial judgment in favor of AASHA based upon that stipulated settlement, as well as to dismiss AASHA’s second cross claim against Hunt. We agree with the AASHA defendants that the court abused its discretion in vacating the partial judgment in its entirety (see generally
We further agree with the AASHA defendants that, insofar as the statement in the order that the only “remaining claim to be tried [is] the first [c]ross[c]laim” may be interpreted as a dismissal of the AASHA defendants’ counterclaim, the court erred in doing so. The counterclaim was not a “subject” of Hunt’s
Finally, we reject the AASHA defendants’ contention that the court abused its discretion in granting Hunt’s motion to consolidate this action with an action commenced by the OIN in Onondaga County related to the project (see generally Dias v Berman, 188 AD2d 331 [1992]; Zimmerman v Mansell, 184 AD2d 1084 [1992]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Green, Gorski and Martoche, JJ.