*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________
AIRGAS-EAST, INC., : CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 5:08-cv-318
: GT & S, INC., et al., :
Defendants. : __________________________________________ :
ORDER nd AND NOW, this 22 day of January, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant, LVH’s,
Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 49), Plaintiff’s response in opposition (doc. no. 51), Defendant’s reply (doc. no. 66), Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. no. 50), Defendant’s response in opposition (doc. no. 56), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (doc. no. 50) is GRANTED and Defendant’s motion (doc. no. 49) is DENIED .
BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg _____________________________ MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.