Aguilera v. State, 526 So. 2d 217

PER CURIAM.

Defense counsel’s specific agreement with the trial court’s determination not to instruct on an arguably necessarily lesser included offense in this non-capital case precludes raising the issue on appeal. Jones v. State, 484 So.2d 577 (Fla.1986); Weyrick v. State, 485 So.2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); compare Harris v. State, 438 So.2d 787 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 963, 104 S.Ct. 2181, 80 L.Ed.2d 563 (opposite rule in capital case). On that basis, the appellant’s only contention may not be considered.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Aguilera v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jun 14, 1988

Citations: 526 So. 2d 217; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1401; 1988 WL 59454; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2417; No. 87-1486

Docket Number: No. 87-1486

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.