midpage

Aguilera v. StateAguilera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jun 14, 1988
No. 87-1486
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Baskin
PER CURIAM.

Defense counsel’s specific agreement with the ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍trial court’s determination not to *218instruct on an arguably necessarily lesser included offense in this ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍non-capital case precludes raising the issue on appeal. Jones v. State, 484 So.2d 577 (Fla.1986); Weyrick v. ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍State, 485 So.2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); compare Harris v. State, 438 So.2d 787 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 466 ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍U.S. 963, 104 S.Ct. 2181, 80 L.Ed.2d 563 (opposite rule in capital case). On that basis, the ‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‍appellant’s only contention may not be considered.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Aguilera v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 14, 1988
Citations: 526 So. 2d 217; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1401; 1988 WL 59454; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2417; No. 87-1486
Docket Number: No. 87-1486
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In