32:T519,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Aguilar-Escoto v. Sessions, 16-1090E","datePublished":"2017-12-13","legislationDate":"2017-12-13","citation":"Aguilar-Escoto v. Sessions, No. 16-1090E (1st Cir. Dec 13, 2017)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit","description":"Read the full text of Aguilar-Escoto v. Sessions (Aguilar-Escoto v. Sessions, No. 16-1090E (1st Cir. Dec 13, 2017)). This legal opinion, filed in 2017-12-13, from the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/aguilar-escoto-v-sessions--4228596"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/aguilar-escoto-v-sessions--4228596","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Aguilar-Escoto v. Sessions, Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Aguilar-Escoto v. Sessions, No. 16-1090E (1st Cir. Dec 13, 2017)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T518,

*1 United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit No. 16-1090

IRMA AGUILAR-ESCOTO, Petitioner, v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on October 27, 2017, is amended as follows:

On page 7, lines 14-19, remove: "We note, for the benefit of the agency on remand, that the Board's failure to consider Aguilar's documentary evidence may have been rooted in its fundamental misunderstanding of her claim. Again, the Board appears to have operated under the mistaken assumption that Aguilar had applied for asylum as well as withholding of removal."

Replace the deleted sentences with: "We observe, again, that Aguilar was not eligible for asylum and instead sought withholding of removal.