midpage

Agostino v. Pennysaver Group, Inc.Agostino v. Pennysaver Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 11, 2001
Versions:284 A.D.2d 353
725 N.Y.S.2d 900
2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6048

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), dated September 7, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposing the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether the defendant’s employee was acting within the scope of employment when the employee’s vehicle struck her (see, Lundberg v State of New York, 25 NY2d 467; Donitz v Mui, 247 AD2d 508; Howard v Hilton, 244 AD2d 912; Casimiro v Thayer, 229 AD2d 958). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Agostino v. Pennysaver Group, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 11, 2001
Citations: 284 A.D.2d 353; 725 N.Y.S.2d 900; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6048
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In