History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adler v. Long Island Railroad Company
297 N.Y. 542
| NY | 1947
|
Check Treatment

As to the defendant Long Island Railroad Company, judgment affirmed, with costs. Concur: LEWIS, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. Dissent: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.

As to the defendant Tully Di Napoli, Inc., judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and FULD, JJ. DYE, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the ground there is no common-law liability of this defendant under the authority ofMoore v. Wills, Inc. (250 N.Y. 426) and Iacono v. Frank Frank Contracting Co. (259 N.Y. 377).

A majority of the court is of opinion that subdivision 7 of section 241 of the Labor Law has no application to either defendant in the circumstances of this case. A majority of the court is of opinion that there was evidence of common-law negligence proper to be submitted to the jury as against the defendant Tully Di Napoli, Inc.

Case Details

Case Name: Adler v. Long Island Railroad Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 2, 1947
Citation: 297 N.Y. 542
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.