Case Information
*1 Case 2:25-cv-00558-AH-JC Document 30 Filed 06/25/25 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#:139 *2 Case 2:25-cv-00558-AH-JC Document 30 Filed 06/25/25 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:140
Neither of the Parties address whether this Court has jurisdiction to review the revocation of the I-130, [2] APA violations in this specific case, [3] or due process violations, [4] which Plaintiffs have now clarified are being raised as separate claims from the Form I-485.
Accordingly, the Court orders the Parties to file supplemental briefing addressing whether the Court has jurisdiction to review the revocation of the I-130, APA violations in this case, and due process violations. The Parties should address only the jurisdictional issues.
Plaintiffs shall file their papers by July 9, 2025 . Defendants shall file their papers by July 23, 2025 . As Plaintiffs are the party asserting federal jurisdiction, Plaintiffs’ failure to respond timely and adequately to this Order shall result in denial of their pending Rule 60 Motion. Plaintiffs’ Rule 60 Motion is under submission until jurisdiction is determined.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
NOTES
[2] See, e.g., Bouarfa v. Mayorkas , 604 U.S. 6 (2024).
[3] See, e.g., Kerur v. Mayorkas , 2024 WL 1024742, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2024) (“the APA allows for judicial review of agency action except when statutes preclude judicial review”) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(1)) (cleaned up).
[4] See, e.g., Gutierrez v. United States , 857 F.App’x 944 (9th Cir. Sept. 3, 2021). Page 2 of 2 C IVIL M INUTES – G ENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk YS