History
  • No items yet
midpage
Aderhold v. England
73 F.2d 91
5th Cir.
1934
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By this appeal the warden of the Atlanta Penitentiary contends that the district judge erred in computing deductions from a second *92sentence imposed upon appellee, a prisoner in the penitentiary. The facts upon which the District Court acted are not shown by the petition, or by any evidence in the record.

It follows that the judgment must be, and it is, affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Aderhold v. England
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 16, 1934
Citation: 73 F.2d 91
Docket Number: No. 7513
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.