955 So. 2d 1107 | Ala. Crim. App. | 2006
The appellant, Renaldo Chante Adams, was convicted of four counts of capital murder and one count of first-degree robbery. He was sentenced to death on the capital-murder convictions and to life imprisonment on the robbery conviction. This Court affirmed Adams's capital-murder convictions and death sentence, but remanded the case for the trial court to set aside Adams's robbery conviction and sentence of life imprisonment as violative of double-jeopardy principles. Adams v.State,
Ex parte Adams,"In Roper v. Simmons,
543 U.S. 551 ,125 S.Ct. 1183 ,161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005), decided after the Court of Criminal Appeals issued its decision in this case, the United States Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional to execute an offender who was under the age of 18 when he or she committed the offense. The opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals states that Adams was 17 years old at the time of the offense.955 So.2d at 1049 . Nothing filed in this Court disputes that fact. Thus, it would appear that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Roper applies to Adams's sentence; therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals as to Adams's sentence and remand the cause for a determination of the impact of Roper on Adams's sentence. As to all other issues raised in Adams's petition, certiorari review is denied."
Adams was born on July 1, 1980; the murder occurred on the evening of August 20, 1997. The record clearly indicates that Adams was 17 years of age at the time of the murder. Thus, because Adams was under the age of 18 when he committed the murder, his sentence of death is due to be set aside pursuant to Roper v. Simmons,
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.*
COBB, BASCHAB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.