History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adams v. State
126 Tex. Crim. 318
Tex. Crim. App.
1934
Check Treatment

The offense is adultery; the punishment, a fine of five hundred dollars.

We are not authorized to consider the statement of facts. It is in question and answer form. The statute demands that it be in narrative form. Article 760, C. C. P.; Mitchell v. State,54 S.W.2d 107.

In the absence of the statement of facts the bills of exception found in the record cannot be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Adams v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 23, 1934
Citation: 126 Tex. Crim. 318
Docket Number: No. 16750.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.