Adams v. State, 90 So. 42

SAMFORD, J.

We have carefully examined the evidence in this case, and are of the opinion that the evidence for the state is not sufficient upon which to base a conviction, and that the affirmative charge as requested by the defendant should have been given. Mitchell v. State, ante, p. 119, 89 South. 98.

For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Adams v. State

Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals

Date Published: May 10, 1921

Citations: 90 So. 42; 18 Ala. App. 143; 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 117; 8 Div. 795.

Docket Number: 8 Div. 795.

Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.