History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adams v. Medtronic, Inc.
4:19-cv-00870-SDJ-KPJ
E.D. Tex.
Mar 28, 2022
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Case 4:19-cv-00870-SDJ-KPJ Document 74 Filed 03/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 968

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JANET ADAMS § and RANDY ADAMS § §

v. § Civil No. 4:19-cv-870-SDJ-KPJ §

MEDTRONIC, INC. et al. §

§ MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 24, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”) (Dkt. #72) that Defendants Medtronic, Inc., Covidien LP, Covidien Sales LLC, and Covidien Holding, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) (Dkt. #31) be denied without prejudice. The parties agreed to waive the fourteen-day objection period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) with respect to the Report. See Dkt. #72 at 3.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Motion (Dkt. #31) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Case Details

Case Name: Adams v. Medtronic, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Texas
Date Published: Mar 28, 2022
Docket Number: 4:19-cv-00870-SDJ-KPJ
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.