History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adams v. La Comb
1 Dall. 440
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1789
Check Treatment
Shippen, President,

in the charge to the Jury, delivered it as the clear opinion of the Court, that the right of pursuing and seizing goods after their removal, was confined to the goods of the Lessee, from whom the rent was really due; and that the goods of a stranger could only be distrained while they were on the premisses.

Case Details

Case Name: Adams v. La Comb
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Date Published: Jun 15, 1789
Citation: 1 Dall. 440
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.