Adams v. Horton

97 N.J.L. 312 | N.J. | 1922

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Black, ICat-zenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.