| N.J. | Feb 9, 1922

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Black, ICat-zenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.