History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adams v. Hazelrigg
86 Wash. 694
Wash.
1915
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This is an action for damages alleged to have been received by the respondent in an assault and battery made upon her by the appellant.

The principal question upon this appeal is which was the aggressor in the affray. There is hopeless conflict in the evidence upon this question. The trial court found that the defendant was the aggressor. We have read the entire record with care, and are not convinced that the trial court was wrong in this conclusion.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Adams v. Hazelrigg
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 15, 1915
Citation: 86 Wash. 694
Docket Number: No. 12705
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.