101 Neb. 690 | Neb. | 1917
The question in this case is whether a city of the metropolitan class has the power to regulate the compensation of firemen, or the state has reserved to itself that power and has fixed their compensation. The Banning Act gave all cities of the state having a population of 5,000 or more general powers of- self-government. Section 11 of the Banning Act (Laws 1911, ch. 24) provides that the city council shall have “all executive or legislative or judicial powers and duties hitherto held, possessed or exercised under the then existing laws governing any such city, by the mayor or mayor and city council,” etc., with a proviso in regard to the water board of metropolitan cities and other matters which do not affect this question. When this Banning Act was enacted there was in force in this state a statute fixing the salaries of police officers and members of the fire department in cities of the metropolitan class (Rev. St. 1913, sec, 4210), so that when this act was enacted the
It will further be observed that afterwards the legislature has assumed to regulate those matters by amending section 4210, Rev. St. 1913. In 1915 (LaAvs 1915, ch. 77) the salaries of policemen and firemen are specifically fixed by the legislature in an act amending section 4210, and repealing that section. That section seems to fix the salaries of these officers at $100 a month. The district court so held, and its judgment is therefore
Affirmed.