74 Ky. 49 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1874
delivered the opinion op the court. ‘
The amount in controversy in this action does not exceed five hundred dollars. 'The claim asserted is an unliquidated account for a balance claimed to be due for work and labor done and performed. .At the common law it would not prima fade bear interest. (Chitty on Contracts, 11th Am. Ed., vol. 2, p. 952; Murray v. Ware’s adm’r, 1 Bibb, 325.)
On such demands interest is sometimes allowed by way of damages in cases in which the debtor is justly chargeable with delinquency, but never when the delay is the result of the mere failure of the creditor to press the collection of his claim. (Morford v. Ambrose and others, 3 John J. Marshall, 688.)
But to'recover interest accruing anterior to the institution of an action on an unliquidated account, or to recover damages in lieu of such interest, it is necessary that the plaintiff shall ask for that character of relief, otherwise the presumption of law that the claim was not theretofore bearing interest will be allowed to prevail. The English rule prior to the statute of 3 & 4 William IV was “that the declaration should be special where damages for the use of money are sought to be recovered, and the claim is not eo nomine for interest as a debt,” and since that statute it is still necessary to claim damages sufficient to cover the interest, otherwise it will not be allowed. (Chitty’s Pleading, vol. 1, side page 358.)
Under the rules of pleading in this state it is not perhaps necessary that there shall be a special count for interest or damages; but where,--as in this case, the principal cause of
The court below properly refused to transfer the action to the Circuit Court of the United States, and properly refused to stay proceedings.
The remaining questions presented by appellee will not be noticed, as from this conclusion an affirmance necessarily results. ' Judgment affirmed.
