82 Neb. 684 | Neb. | 1908
The plaintiffs, who are judgment creditors of the defendant James E. Cook, instituted this action for the purpose of reaching and subjecting to the payment of their
For the purpose of proving that defendant Elton Cook had been emancipated, he was permitted over objection to testify as follows: “Q. Had you been emancipated by your father; that is, you were to have your own time and your own wages prior to the time you became of age? A. Yes, sir. Q. You may state about when you received
On cross-examination plaintiffs were refused an answer to the question: “Who suggested that you come out here (to Rock county) to buy land?” This also was error.
By the Court: For the reasons in the foregoing opinion, the. judgment of the district court is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed.