122 Minn. 524 | Minn. | 1913
Action to recover $110 and interest, the price of a well constructed by plaintiff for defendant. The defense was that the agreement was for a 3-ineh well,, while the well constructed was only a 2-inch one, and that, as completed by plain
The assignments of error raise but one question, the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the submission of the case to the jury, and to warrant the verdict in defendant’s favor.
We have examined the evidence, and find it conflicting on both issues. It is ■entirely clear that there is no ground upon which this court can disturb the verdict. There is certainly sufficient evidence to sustain it.
Order affirmed.