History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ackley v. Ackley
1 Sadler 138
Pa.
1885
Check Treatment
Per Curiam :

This is not the case of a parol sale of land. It is a resulting trust. It arose from the payment of a portion of the purchase money at the time of the purchase. It does not rest on a subsequent agreement. The evidence is clear, specific, and most ample to establish the agreement of the parties to purchase for their joint benefit, followed by the- purchase in pursuance of that agreement, and a joint payment of the purchase money.

This was followed by a joint possession of some fifty years. During this time large and valuable improvements were made thereon at their joint expense, and the right of each to a share in the land was frequently admitted by Joshua Ackley, in express and clear language.

The evidence to establish the trust was amply sufficient to submit to the jury and justifies the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ackley v. Ackley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 19, 1885
Citation: 1 Sadler 138
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.