History
  • No items yet
midpage
7 N.W. 772
Mich.
1881
Marston, C. J.

The decree of tbe court below dismissing the bill of complaint was unquestionably correct. The testimony of complainant’s witnesses, standing alone, would fall far short of establishing a case sufficient to justify a court in severing the marriage relation between these parties. The testimony we need not discuss. Much of it bears no relation to the issue and is disgusting in character.

The decree must be affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Ackerman v. Ackerman
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 5, 1881
Citations: 7 N.W. 772; 45 Mich. 135; 1881 Mich. LEXIS 667
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Ackerman v. Ackerman, 7 N.W. 772