1:25-vv-00053
Fed. Cl.
Aug 29, 2025

BRITTANY ABRAMSON, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

No. 25-0053V

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

July 28, 2025

Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 28, 2025

Daniel Alholm, Alholm Law PC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.

Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On January 13, 2025, Brittany Abramson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act“). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA“) following an influenza vaccination she received on September 20, 2023. Petition at ¶¶ 1. Petitioner further alleges that her “SIRVA injury has lasted more than six months.” Petition at ¶¶ 13. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 7, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent‘s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent states that “Petitioner‘s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior to vaccination; pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain was limited to her vaccinated shoulder; and no other condition or abnormality explains Petitioner‘s shoulder pain.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “based on the current record, Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.

In view of Respondent‘s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

Notes

1
Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).