37 Ga. App. 220 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1927
An agreement between the holder of a past-due note and a stranger to the note, that in consideration of the stranger’s deposit of certain property as collateral security for .its payment, the holder will refrain from bringing suit upon it for an indefinite time, is lacking in consideration, in that the promise to extend the time of payment is so indefinite as to be incapable of enforcement, and therefore constitutes no consideration for the act of the stranger in depositing the collateral. 1 Joyce on Defenses to Commercial Paper, 411.
2. In such a case, where the stranger brought a suit in trover against the holder of the note, to recover for an alleged conversion of the plaintiff’s property deposited as security for the payment of the note,
Judgment reversed.